Need For Closure: A Reporter’s Journey


As a little girl, my town crier tendencies for the mundane — yet all-important — events in the world of a kid were legendary: “David fell off his bike!” or “The dog caught a rabbit!” or “The mail is here!”
And now, as an adult and full-fledged journalist, when life is much more complicated, it’s not enough for me to shout from the rooftops what’s happening. I need to understand why and how. And make it snappy.
It seems I’m not alone.
No matter what the event, there is a proven psychological “need for closure” that drives journalists and the public to learn and process information in a blink of an eye. As Maria Konnikova writes in The New Yorker:
“The term “cognitive closure” was coined by the social psychologist Arie Kruglanski, who eventually defined it as “individuals’ desire for a firm answer to a question and an aversion toward ambiguity,” a drive for certainty in the face of a less than certain world. When faced with heightened ambiguity and a lack of clear-cut answers, we need to know—and as quickly as possible.”
The mistakes journalists make in reporting news in “Breaking News” situations are at the heart of the N.F.C. theory. The storytellers and the public are clamoring for one thing: answers. And with answers come reassurance and understanding and a place to put the information in the box in your brain. The psychic need is so strong that networks can greatly boost their profits during “breaking” stories.
But from a purely mercenary point of it, doesn’t that argue for prolonging the definitive answers – especially if you’re a network exec with a Profit and Loss statement to manage? Instead, networks tout “exclusives” telling the world their reporters are the best. And if the answers come too soon, the mystery may dissolve, causing viewers to tune out.
Nonetheless, Konnikova’s conclusion that the need for closure cannot be a crutch “to be the first to tweet or post or report” is spot on–and not only because of the mistakes made by social and mainstream media during the Boston bombings. Just because we know why we do something, doesn’t mean we should do it.
Share this article
You might also like:
Comments
Latest Posts
New Twitter App ‘Retwacts’ Your Tweets
May 23rd, 2013On a really bad day, a quick, inaccurate tweet can spiral a news story out of control, as seen prominently during the coverage of the recent bombings in Boston. As of now, Twitter doesn’t have its own fix.
As the Atlantic’s Brian Fung reported earlier this month, software developer Stonly Baptiste – whose daytime job is with the Pennsylvania-based company independenceIT – has developed a plug-in app that could solve the problem. He named it Retweet Retwact or Retwact (see what he did there?).
Soldier ‘Before and After’ Portraits Go Viral
May 23rd, 2013We Are Not the Dead documents the effects of war in a virtual photo gallery. The images portray 15 British soldiers before, during and after serving in Afghanistan and are captioned with their thoughts from each time period. Between yearnings for the feel of carpet underfoot and expressions of repatriated culture shock (pink hair!) it chronicles the limitless human capacity to normalize anything, even IEDs. It is just how we cope.
“It was a nightmare trying to extract [a wounded soldier] and get the chopper in while we were in water up to your chin, it was horrible,” says Private Ben Frater, 21. “And now we are home? It’s strange. Quiet. I find that I’m getting bored easily after 10 minutes. I feel anxious all the time that I should be doing something.”
Is Facebook Lamebook for Teens?
May 23rd, 2013Kids these days. New research out of the Pew Internet & American Life Project this week tells us that while young people, ages 12 to 17, share more personal information on Facebook, they’re also not as into it.
A reported 91 percent of teenagers posted pictures on Facebook in 2012, versus 79 percent back in 2006. Along similar lines, 71 percent use their school name on their profile, up from 49 percent. Even information that’s more personal, like one’s email address or phone number, are being shared by a higher percentage of teens. In 2006, only 29 percent of Facebook users posted their email addresses. In 2012, that rose to 53 percent. In 2006, 2 percent of users revealed their phone numbers. Now, it’s up to 20 percent.
At the same time, researchers turned to focus groups to find out how teenagers feel about the site–and how they feel is not as enthused.
Flip the News: A Real Gender-Bender
May 22nd, 2013How’s this for a thought experiment. Say Yahoo CEO Melissa Mayer was a guy and Tumblr’s boss David Karp was a woman–would stories about Yahoo buying Tumblr for $1.1 billion earlier this week have read the same?
That’s, in part, what the new Tumblr blog Flip the News is trying to ponder, post by post, flipping an article subject’s gender or race.
The blog’s author most recently flipped a New York Times profile about Karp, who dropped out of high school to become home-schooled at his mother’s suggestion and is now part of “a tiny circle of 20-something entrepreneurs, hoodie-wearing characters like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Foursquare’s Dennis Crowley, who have struck it rich before turning 30,” according to Jenna Wortham at the Times.
Tiny Games, Big Thrill, Long Wait
May 22nd, 2013Tiny Games is the best app no money can buy.
It’s still in development, due in October, but it’s already a massive success, having received adoring coverage in the tech press after its Kickstarter crowdfunding project more than reached its goal. Heck, I read the Mashable article and spent a fruitless 15 minutes trying to download it before finally realizing it wasn’t released yet.
Tiny Games is an app that gives you games to play in real life, right where you happen to be at that moment, with whoever happens to be handy.