Feeling Safe on Twitter? Think Again

To tweet or not to tweet? With nearly 200 million registered Twitter accounts, more than 50 million “active” users, and roughly 3 million tweets posted every day, much of the world would seem to respond in the affirmative. A recent court ruling, however, might begin to lessen Twitter’s appeal.
This past week, a New York judge decided in favor of prosecutors who sought access to the Twitter account of an Occupy Wall Street protestor over a three-month period.
While conceding the protestor’s “public tweets” are open season, Yale Law School professor Adam Cohen worries the ruling may have given the state goverment much more than the technological equivalent of air. Beyond “public tweets,” the Time contributor fears the government may also wind up with access to the protestor’s private tweets, alongside IP addressess and other personal data. With such information, Cohen warns, the government could potentially reconstruct where the protestor was on a minute-by-minute basis.
Or, for that matter, any of us. If the ruling provides the state access to such information without a search warrant, Cohen frets the court might be opening the gates to broad government intrusion into the private lives of Internet users.
The key word, of course, is “if.” Until we know exactly what information the court awarded the prosecutors, it would be imprudent to judge the court’s decision. But the day Twitter functions as a free government radar to my whereabouts is the day I wish Twitter a pleasant goodbye.
You might also like:
Comments
Latest Posts
Lauren Ashburn/Howard Kurtz: At White House, Last Live Shot From Pebble Beach
July 17th, 2012Shortly before the demolition of Pebble Beach–the concrete riser that was the stage for countless live shots at the White House–Lauren Ashburn and Howard Kurtz used it to say farewell to an ugly icon.
Our Picks: Top Political Stories
July 17th, 2012Today’s most provocative reads:
Conor Friedersdorf says Barack Obama is being disingenuous by attacking Mitt Romney over outsourcing. (Shocking!) The reason, he says, is that if the president is reelected “he’s no more going to stop outsourcing or end offshore bank accounts (though some of Romney’s seem shady) than he’s going to renegotiate NAFTA. He’s going to keep staffing his economic team with establishment elites from Wall Street and Ivy League universities.” (The Atlantic)
David Frum says the real problem with Romney’s inability to respond to Obama’s attacks on Bain and tax returns is the same that he faced during the Republican primaries: he looks weak. “At every point, Romney has surrendered to the fringe of his party. Weak. And now in his first tough encounter with Barack Obama, Romney is being shoved around again. This is not what a president looks like – anyway, not a successful president.” (Daily Beast)
Mark Halperin gives props to “the ruthless killing machine that is the combined White House-Chicago operation.” He pulls back the curtain on how Obama’s team has orchestrated the anti-Romney news coverage through leaks which strategists then publicly cite as evidence of independent vetting of the Republican candidate. “They have parceled out their opposition research in a manner both strategic and tactical, selecting specific news organizations at times of their choosing to maximize the drip-drip-drip of the twin stories. They have used left-leaning Web outfits as recipients of over-the-transom gifts as effectively (cumulatively) as the Romney campaign uses Drudge. And they have seen the Boston Globe use its credibility to drive a ton of news.” (Time)
Why On Earth Did Marissa Mayer Say Yes to Yahoo?
July 17th, 2012Yahoo has had its “grown up” Valley CEO.
It has had its studio mogul CEO.
It has had its returning visionary founder CEO.
It has had its hard-charging, execution-centric CEO.
It has had its misrepresenting, train-wreck, patent troll CEO.
And now, with the stunning appointment of Marissa Mayer, Yahoo tries to go yet another route: A CEO with bona-fide Web tech chops. Give the new board credit for one thing: At least it’s not repeating mistakes of the past.
Hey Candidates, Time to Talk Jobs
July 17th, 2012This article in The Atlantic has unleashed my angry inner cynic. There’s no use covering our ears and pouting when the obvious verdict is ringing in red and blue heads alike— “ neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney is going to turn things around anytime soon,” because neither candidate has an actual strategy to combat the creeping unemployment rate. [...]
Open Secrets Reveals Political Donations
July 17th, 2012When I think of how super PACs financially support candidates, I envision the underbelly of campaign politics where millions of dollars pass between the hands of supporters and candidates. It is difficult to determine who is paying for that well-produced attack ad.
In comes Open Secrets, a database created by the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), which blows the lid off of political donations by examining who donates what to which candidate. The website also explores the interest groups that are lobbying on which Capitol Hill agencies, and what investments are held by our elected officials.