Enough with the Liberal Bias, Huffington Post

Dear Huffington Post,
You are seven years old now. That is nearly 35 years old in Internet years. Don’t you think it’s about time to grow up? Don’t you think it’s time for a new you?
There was a time, when you were a little baby website back in 2005, when the world needed more blogs. It needed more political blogs, especially on the left, to balance against the mighty Drudge Report.
And as the decade played out, a few other left-leaning websites rose to become the voice of Liberal action. The DailyKos was one example of a website that put its political leaning ahead of any sort of “mass appeal,” which is why it has never really gone mainstream or accelerated in traffic. That was their decision, and they have nothing to regret.
But, you, Huffington Post, wanted to be the popular kid. And that meant that you needed to broaden your coverage to include new topics — like sports — and to balance your ideology to include more Americans in the political mainstream. You achieved the former.
But to this very day — and at a time when America needs even-handed and reasonable dialogue more than ever — you have to act like a child and fuel the fire of political gridlock. You are a highly partisan website. This will not appeal to the mainstream, nor will it make advertisers love you.
I read many publications on New Year’s Eve, to see how various sites were covering the Biden-McConnell bipartisan compromise, and the only one that was screaming like a baby was you, Huffington Post.
Politico and Business Insider — yes, Business Insider!– offered thoughtful/up-to-the-minute unbiased reporting. PolicyMic, an up-and-coming publication aimed at young voters, went out of its way to offer multiple perspectives. Even the mainstream media was more concerned with a deal getting done — heck, even the curmudgeonly CNBC wanted to see a deal happen regardless of who “won” or “lost.”
But Huffington Post ran a headline bemoaning how the Democrats had lost leverage on squeezing more tax revenue out of Republicans. It then linked to a handful of highly partisan Liberals who blasted the president and accused him of being a huge pussy. It published lead stories like this and prominently linked to stories like this. After the House passed the bill, this story appeared prominently above the fold — written by a Columbia professor who represents the left-most one percent.
My theory on the Huffington Post has always been this: It is an incredible company that is held down only by its reputation for being too partisan/Liberal, as pushed by Arianna Huffington. Everyone knows that advertisers shy away from political magazines, lest they alienate their customers. I can only imagine that AOL’s sales guys are moaning and groaning over how little the Huffington Post editorial team has managed to curtail their childish shrieking.
Highly controversial political rags are one of the last places a major brand wants to appear. Only pornography occupies a lower spot on the totem pole. Fox News may have great ratings, but look at how crappy its advertisers are (“Buy Gold now!”).
So I doubt that the “business guys” over at AOL are mandating that the Huffington Post continue to publish ultra-extremist viewpoints.
As an Independent voter who has recently leaned Democrat — in large part due to my distaste for the Tea Party — the last thing that I want to read is a bunch of people who occupy the extreme left bitch about the president before he even takes his second oath.
But, some people will say, hasn’t Arianna enjoyed great success by driving the Huffington Post into a leadership position amongst Liberal publications? Won’t she “lose her base” if she changes the voice of the site?
No, that’s ridiculous.
A cursory glance at Comscore demographic data will show you that Huffington Post readers are not Liberals to begin with. What do Liberals look like? More so than the population at large, they are: Women, Young, Minority, West Coast-ers.
But, guess what? According to Comscore, the typical Huffington Post reader is Male, Elderly, White, and doesn’t live on the West Coast.
What this tells me is that a bunch of readers — probably about 20 million of them — are duplicates from AOL.com, who link to the Huffington Post almost exclusively. The balance are probably everyday people who use Google and end up on the site. There probably is a small contingent of direct/loyal visitors who love the ultra-Liberal angel, but I’ll bet that they could get a lot more readers if they didn’t piss off most of America.
And when I read their coverage of the Fiscal Cliff negotiations, it just pissed me off. And I’m a Moderate who, more than anything, wants this country to get its act together. This compromise was a small step in the right direction. The Dow Jones went up 500 points in two days. That wasn’t a coincidence. Markets talk.
And when I see extremists on both sides of the spectrum complaining about it, that is when I knowthat it was a successful compromise. I just don’t expect the Huffington Post to be one of those extremists. Because it is no longer the year 2006. And the Huffington Post is no longer the “Liberal Drudge Report.”
Indeed, as Sarah wrote in her breakdown of why the founders wanted to sell, co-founder Jonah Peretti had long since tired of that mission, and CEO Eric Hippeau was never into it. The biggest problem that drove Huffington Post to sell was that the site “was growing up” and the co-founders and principles all wanted that to go in different directions, Peretti said.
The property is too valuable and too advanced in its audience and content strategy to still be lingering in some 1960s socialist utopia.
Bleacher Report owes a great deal to the Huffington Post’s success, and their sale to AOL was a wonderful example for us to follow. I have had the pleasure to meet many people who built the Huffington Post, and every single one of them impressed the hell out of me. This is a publication that I want to support.
But I think that there may be some internal confusion at AOL as to what the Huffington Post was, is, and can be.
It may think it knows its own identity. But it doesn’t.
Bryan Goldberg is a San Francisco entrepreneur and founder of the Bleacher Report.
The piece brought to you through our content partnership with Pando Daily, where it first appeared.
You might also like:
Comments
Latest Posts
Stephen Colbert’s Congressional Candidate Sister
January 19th, 2013One of the ongoing gags of Stephen Colbert’s television show is the Comedy Central star’s constant willingness to float runs for public office. Colbert has started a SuperPAC, run for President and, most recently, campaigned for an appointment to the US Senate seat vacated by Jim DeMint’s retirement. These have all been in good fun. No one ever expected to see the comedian leaving his late night show for elected office. It was all a gag. But now Colbert’s sister is running for Congress and she’s dead serious about it.
A California Entrepreneur’s Take on Washington Gridlock
January 19th, 2013Andrew Nikou, chief executive of OpenGate Capital, talks about business and politics.
Watch: Armstrong Called Out By Wife of Ex-Teammate Live on CNN
January 18th, 2013Betsy Andreu, wife of Lance Armstrong’s former teammate Frankie Andreu, erupted on CNN after listening to Armstrong’s interview with Oprah Winfrey on Thursday. Mrs. Andreu was a guest on Anderson Cooper’s “AC360″ and appeared visibly upset with Lance’s lack of contrition.
Armstrong joked with Oprah during the interview that while he admitted to Andreu that he called her “crazy” and a “bitch,” he “never called her fat” – implying that guesture was some form of consolation. Watch Andreu react:
A Clash Over the Media and Beltway Gridlock at Daily Download Event
January 18th, 2013Michael Steele, the former Republican Party chairman, faulted his party for moving too far right–and said that breakneck media coverage “does a disservice to game shows.”
Lanny Davis, the former Clinton White House adviser, faulted President Obama for throwing “red meat” to his liberal base–and blamed the media for ignoring common-ground solutions.
And Howard Kurtz said the media provide incentives to political figures to make inflammatory attacks that receive wide coverage.
Crash: Lance Armstrong Emerges As Unlikable Liar Under Oprah Winfrey’s Prodding
January 18th, 2013Oprah Winfrey didn’t pussyfoot around.
She got Lance Armstrong to confess in the first minute.
It was a curiously unemotional moment, the prosecutor leading the witness through what seemed like well-rehearsed paces in a businesslike fashion.
Armstrong said he was sorry for all the years of lying, but he sounded like he was reading a shopping list. He may have been wearing a lavender shirt that Oprah’s violet dress, but the disgraced cycling champion was anything but colorful.
On her cable channel Thursday night, Winfrey wisely began with a series of yes-or-no questions that brought a decade of deception to an end.
Did Armstrong take banned substances? Yes. EPO? Yes. Blood transfusions? Yes. In winning all seven Tour de France titles? Yes.
If you changed the channel then, you didn’t miss much.