Texting While Driving: Why Are We Blaming the Senders?

Does texting someone you know is driving make you “electronically present” at the scene of an accident? It might, at least in New Jersey.

A court there ruled last week:

We hold that the sender of a text message can potentially be liable if an accident is caused by texting, but only if the sender knew or had special reason to know that the recipient would view the text while driving and thus be distracted.

It was probably only a matter of time before judges agreed with this kind of litigious logic, the idea is that the person on the other end of the text is knowingly creating a distraction by sending a text. As if the driver couldn’t make the responsible choice to turn off or ignore his phone if he finds it  impossible to check their notifications behind the wheel.

Should we start suing passengers too? I know I occasionally find passengers distracting when they bring up difficult subjects or comment on passing scenery while I’m driving.

The ruling, and use of the phrase “electronically present” to entangle someone not physically involved in the accident at the root of the case, seems particularly ironic at a time when many of us are feeling increasingly concerned about digital alienation. The viral video “I Forgot My Phone” depicts reality for most of us: being physically present with friends who are constantly on their smartphones.

Smartphone abuse is a real problem, causing us to miss beautiful sunsets, quiet moments of intimacy, and red lights. It seems the courts might start cracking down on people who can’t disconnect from technology long enough to drive safely, while meanwhile at social events like weddings, brides and grooms are imposing leave-your-phone-at-the-door policies to try to force their guests to focus on their physical surroundings.

I like my phone (almost) as much as the next person, and I dislike people telling me how to use it even more than the next person, but these both seem like flawed reactions to those of us who need Smartphones Anonymous.

So stop abusing your smartphones, people, before it’s too late for the rest of us.

Share this article

You might also like:

Comments

Latest Posts

Twerking Hoax: Should We Be Mad at Jimmy Kimmel?

September 11th, 2013

I fell for it. I shared the viral “Worst Twerk Fail EVER – Girl Catches Fire!” YouTube video.

And then Jimmy Kimmel told the world they’d been punk’d. He and stunt woman Daphne Avalon staged the whole thing. “Thank you for helping us deceive the world and hopefully put an end to twerking forever,” the late night host told Avalon on his show Monday night.

I think twerking will survive awhile longer.

Why Hashtags are Failing on Facebook

September 4th, 2013

When Twitter-style searchable hashtags were introduced to Facebook a few weeks ago, they were hailed by marketers as a brilliant, if long overdue, idea. Now they’re not so sure about that.

New data from a study by the analytics service Edgerank Checker indicates that hashtags actually serve to reduce the viral reach of posts (and, as a side effect, reduce engagement, which is the holy grail of every post, tweet, update, Instagram, and breath a marketer takes; do I sound bitter?).

Edgerank Checker looked at 35,000 posts, 6,000 of which were using hashtags. Well, that right there tells you that adoption is by no means universal. As explained on TheNextWeb, “hashtags on Facebook posts resulted in less viral reach, specifically that there was a decrease in the amount of engagement per fan and wasn’t affected by the size of the fan base — there’s no correlation that the more fans you have, the greater the positive impact on a brand’s engagement.”

Miley Cyrus Rules Twitter: Twerking Trumps Syria

August 28th, 2013

Long, long ago, the news didn’t used to be real until Walter Cronkite said it was. Nowadays, it’s often real at least as news before it even happens: See the Wikipedia entry for “WMDs” or just Google “Brangelina Wedding” for further details.

And anything on Twitter is de facto news. Remember, communications theory defines information as “anything which is communicated,” no matter how meaningless it may be. Oh, and it is.

They used to say “if it bleeds, it leads,” but as the Twitter stats of the past few days have shown us, that’s no longer the case.  This graph compares the Twitter mentions of the escalating civil war in #Syria with mentions of #Twerk. Click and prepare to be disappointed by humanity.

HuffPost Bans Anonymous Comments, But Will It Work?

August 23rd, 2013

The Huffington Post announced this week that anonymous commenters will no longer be allowed as of September.

One small step for HuffPo; one giant leap for the Internet?

HuffPo reportedly gets 25,000 comments every hour, and like pretty much any popular website that allows comments, most of them are not well-reasoned arguments and civil to the writer or other commenters.

National Security? The Most Boring Tumblr Ever

August 23rd, 2013

Who doesn’t love, or love to hate, Tumblr? The popular I-Hate-My-Parents-And-Love-Porn-And-Sherlock platform is home to more raw emotion per pixel than any other site.

It just got a whole lot more grey flannel.

On the orders of POTUS, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has created a Tumblr. Yes, this is what orders from the president consist of nowadays. And it is hella dull.