Vanishing Media: Mitt Romney’s Fast Fade


Willard Mitt Romney stood on the verge of ultimate power as leader of the free world. Now, just moments later, he is about to vanish from the political stage. Perhaps forever.
So what’s a guy to do when booted from the national spotlight without a job? Well, if you’re Romney, you don’t have to do a whole hell of a lot. His millions spare him from worrying about putting food on the table.
In six months, will he be relegated to a mere historical footnote?
Historian Douglas Brinkley, author of the bestselling book Cronkite, argues that life in politics is over for the man who could have been president. “There is no such thing as a Romney Republican,” Brinkley says. The former Massachusetts governor’s move to the center and his flip-flopping on such issues as abortion, health care, and tax cuts during the campaign left many wondering just exactly what he stands for. “He’s not going to be beloved by the conservative movement. Not when you lose when unemployment is 7.9 percent.”
The obvious place for Romney to hang his hat, says Brinkley, is back in the world of business, where the Republican made a fortune as an aggressive dealmaker at Bain Capital. “The only thing he seems proficient at is making himself money,” he says.
“What gets you there is the kind of slobbering attention that is hard to turn off,” says Robert Thompson, professor of popular culture at Syracuse University. “For two-plus years, to be in the center of an international feast of attention … I think there would be real withdrawal.”
Chris Lehane, a longtime Democratic strategist and top spokesman for Al Gore’s presidential campaign, calls this the “cricket dynamic.” “Everyone in the world is kissing the ring and essentially bowing down,” he says. When the billion-dollar business of running for president disappears virtually overnight, “suddenly the only ones around are the crickets.”
The loss of the Secret Service detail, the plane, the entourage, all add up to a big letdown. The candidate, says Lehane, is left thinking: “Where are the people who were my best friends just hours ago?” Romney no longer exerts an appeal on people who were seeking influence in his administration or perhaps land a plum ambassador’s job.
The former governor never seemed like a natural politician and may welcome the chance to retreat to the shadows. In hisbrief concession speech, he did not offer the usual bromides about fighting for his principles or staying involved in the political debate. He has spent the last six years running for president, only to have his hopes crushed just when he and his team were convinced he might win.
“It’s like a sports gig,” says Thompson. “After it’s over, we forget about the team that lost.”
Not to mention that the press corps was voracious until Tuesday about details of his family, his Mormonism, and his potential Cabinet appointees. But interest fades quickly in someone who most likely won’t be a future political player.
What’s more, Romney’s refusal to grant many interviews during the final weeks of his campaign strained relations with the fourth estate. “The media developed a low-simmering disdain for him,” says Brinkley.
Given the size of his bank account, Romney could start a foundation or launch a crusade if he wants to reclaim part of the spotlight. But doing so would require a thirst for issue advocacy that he has never displayed.
When Gore won the popular vote and lost the presidency, he delved into his passions for climate change and technology, ultimately winning a Nobel Prize. Former presidential candidates John Kerry and John McCain still their had jobs as senators to serve as platforms.
Many politicians who had taken a shellacking would retreat to their home base and start rebuilding a career. But Romney lost Massachusetts in a landslide, garnering only 38 percent of the vote. Of course, if he wants to return to his religious roots, there’s always Utah.
But by simply withdrawing from the public square, as George W. Bush has done, Romney would be squandering a prime opportunity. He could use his household-name status, personal wealth, and political experience to make a mark in any realm he chooses.
A man who sold himself to voters as an American success story owes the public more than a wave goodbye.
This article brought to you under our content partnership with The Daily Beast.
You might also like:
Comments
Latest Posts
IM Debate: Why Karl Rove Furor Touched a Nerve
November 10th, 2012There is something about what happened with Karl Rove in the Fox News studio on Election Night that has sparked an incredible public reaction. In their latest IM debate, Lauren Ashburn and Howard Kurtz try to figure out why.
Howie: Our readers are going crazy over our stories and video on Karl Rove going rogue over at Fox. Why has this touched such a nerve?
Lauren: Because you look handsome?
Howie: Okay, but besides that.
Lauren: Seriously, part of it has to do with Fox-haters. There are so many of them that when a prominent prognosticator like Rove bucks his own network, people can’t get enough.
Howie: I’m sure that’s part of it. Part of the country loves Fox and part of the country can’t stand it. Plus all the people still angry at Bush’s architect. But I think it goes deeper than that.
Lauren: People are watching a man who has sunk his life’s work into electing Mitt Romney suffer a crushing defeat.
Howie: So it’s basically schadenfreude?
Lauren: No. It’s like watching a train wreck.
David Petraeus’ Abrupt Exit: Sometimes An Affair Is Just An Affair
November 9th, 2012The resignation of David Petraeus as director of Central Intelligence sparked a flurry of rumors across Washington this afternoon–some of it echoed on social media sites.
Petraeus’s resignation, which was caused by his admission of an extramarital affair, caused all sorts of speculation that this was just some sort of coverup. After all, the former four-star general was due to testify before Congress next week on the death of four American diplomats in Libya, and the chatter said this was all an elaborate excuse to avoid that. It wasn’t.
The affair was discovered in the midst of an unrelated FBI investigation, according to a report in Newsmax.
The timing, of course, was a bit curious, the Friday afternoon immediately after a presidential election–and after Barack Obama had made his first televised statement about his fiscal plans.
DD on CNN’s Starting Point: Karl Rove Goes Rogue at Fox, Trump on Twitter
November 9th, 2012On CNN’s Starting Point, Lauren Ashburn and Howard Kurtz examine Karl Rove challenging Fox on Obama winning Ohio, Donald Trump declaring the election a sham, and how some on the right are losing touch with reality.
Twitter Trends for November 9
November 9th, 2012Today is Friday, November 9th. The election is over, the fiscal cliff is approaching and this is what folks are tweeting about #Scandal - Olivia Pope, played by Kerry Washington, is a professional ‘fixer’ who makes problems go away for politicians before they’re even discovered.his political thriller has been on ABC for two seasons and has followed Olivia [...]
Rejecting Reality: Rove, Trump and the Fringe Factor
November 9th, 2012As televised theater, it was hard to beat. As political prognostication, it was a head-scratching moment. As partisan warfare, it was nothing short of audacious.
But Karl Rove’s insistence that Barack Obama had not carried Ohio—despite the call by his own network, Fox News, that the president had done just that—represented something larger. It captured, for some long and awkward moments, the refusal of some in the media-and-politics game to accept reality.
And that has been a recurring pattern this year.
We’re not talking here about a bad judgment call by a pundit. Everyone in the commentary business, including yours truly, has made those. If failed predictions were a felony, the jails would be filled with media folks.